<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><ArticleSet>
                    <Article>
            <Journal>
                <PublisherName>مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی(ره)</PublisherName>
                <JournalTitle>معرفت کلامی</JournalTitle>
                <Issn>2008-8876</Issn>
                <Volume>4</Volume>
                <Issue>2</Issue>
                <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
                    <Year>2013</Year>
                    <Month>09</Month>
                    <Day>10</Day>
                </PubDate>
            </Journal>
            <ArticleTitle></ArticleTitle>
            <VernacularTitle>نگاهی معرفت‌شناختی به گزاره‌های متواتر در اندیشه‌ی اسلامی</VernacularTitle>
            <FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
            <LastPage>56</LastPage>
            <ELocationID EIdType="pii">681</ELocationID>
            <ELocationID EIdType="doi"></ELocationID>
            <Language>FA</Language>
            <AuthorList>
                        <Author>
            <FirstName>محمد</FirstName>
            <LastName>حسین زاده یزدی</LastName>
            <Affiliation>استاد - گروه فلسفه مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی (ره)</Affiliation>
            <Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0004-8961-876X</Identifier>
        </Author>
                    </AuthorList>
            <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
            <History>
                <PubDate PubStatus="received">
                    <Year>2013</Year>
                    <Month>12</Month>
                    <Day>23</Day>
                </PubDate>
            </History>
            <Abstract>Mutavatirat (unanimously agreed on) which are a kind of arguments based on transmitted knowledge, have a significant role in such sciences like theology, history and homogenous sciences in which the arguments based on transmitted knowledge are powerful. This paper discuses Mutavatir propositions using an epistemological view in that they have certainty and can be the genesis proof. As an introduction, the paper first defines Khabar (tradition) or mutavatir proposition, evaluates the presented definitions and expounds the conditions of the validity of a tradition and then to discover what kind of knowledge we get from mutavatirat: suppositional or certain? If certain, then is it valid or personal? Finally, the paper addresses the principal question, i.e. their being self-evident and origin of theorem. The criticisms which are directed to their self-evidence or certainty are assessed. It is concluded that their epistemological degree is inferior to certainty in its strict sense.</Abstract>
            <OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
            <ObjectList>
                            <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">بدیهی</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">خبر متواتر</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">علم متعارف</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">دلیل نقلی</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">خبر واحد محفوف به قرینه</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">درجه معرفت</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">یقین بالمعنی‌الاخص</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">تراکم احتمال</Param>
            </Object>
                        <Object Type="keyword">
                <Param Name="value">اعتبار معرفت‌شناختی</Param>
            </Object>
                        </ObjectList>
            <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://kalami.nashriyat.ir/sites/kalami.nashriyat.ir/files/article-files/2_5.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>        </Article>
    </ArticleSet>
