Ma`rifat Kalami

Theism and atheism are two currents that are always in conflict. The existence of God, his attributes and actions are the subject of their debates, and extensive debates about their proofs, evidences and evidences have been recorded throughout history. Michael Martin, one of the atheists of today's age, considered God's attributes such as absolute knowledge, freedom, and moral perfection to be the reason for the contradiction and denial of God's existence, and he tried to prove atheism by stating evidence. The present article tries to critically examine this speech and show its weak points with a descriptive-analytical method. After presenting definitions of absolute science, Martin accepts the second definition because it can reach the theologians' goal of scientific perfection. His main objection to theists is that God's scientific perfection is in contradiction with some of his other perfections. In the upcoming reviews, this article examines Martin's definitions and objections to the definitions, and answers those cases where his objections to the definitions were incorrect, and then answers the contradictions between the divine attributes of science, power and will with a few statements.