The Relationship between Science and Religion in Plantinga 's Initial View
Article Type:
Research
Writers:
Abstract:
The relationship between science and religion is one of the crucial issues in the contemporary intellectual environment. Alvin Plantinga has raised some important issues in this regard. He adopts two views and in these views, he believes that in some cases, the relationship between science and religion are in conflict with one another due to the principle of methodological naturalism in science. In his first view, which is based on a metaphor introduced by Augustine, he holds that today science consists in the city of man against the city of God; some scientific findings are contradictory to religious beliefs, this conflict is real and serious. Science and religion contradict one another and this contradiction has roots in methodological naturalism. However, he considers that the role which methodological naturalism has in some parts of science is justifiable. Using a descriptive-analytical method, this paper presents Planinga's viewpoint and criticizes it.
چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
Title :رابطه‌ی علم و دین در دیدگاه اول پلانتینگا
Abstract:
رابطه‌ی علم و دین از مباحث جدی فضای فکری معاصر است. آلوین پلانیتگا مباحث مهمی را در این باره مطرح کرده است. او در این زمینه دو دیدگاه دارد و در هر دو معتقد است که رابطه‌ی علم و دین در مواردی به دلیل اصل طبیعت گرایی روش شناختی در علم، به تعارض کشیده می شود. او در دیدگاه اولش بر اساس استعاره ای از آگوستین می گوید علم در جهان امروز در شهر انسان و در برابر شهر خدا قرار دارد و برخی یافته های علمی با باورهای دینی متعارض اند و این تعارض واقعی و جدی است و هریک از علم و دین، یکدیگر را نقض می کنند و ریشه‌ی این تعارض در طبیعت گرایی روش شناختی است؛ اما با این حال در بخش هایی از علم طبیعت گرایی روش شناختی را مجاز می داند. این مقاله با روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی دیدگاه پلانتینگا را تبیین، و سپس آن را نقد و بررسی می کند.
References:
- باربور، ايان، 1392، دين و علم، ترجمة پيروز فطورچي، تهران، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و انديشه اسلامي.
- پلانتينگا، آلوين، 1380، «علم آگوستيني يا دوئمي؟»، در: جستارهايي در فلسفه دين، ترجمة مرتضي فتحي‌زاده، قم، دانشگاه قم.
- Dawkins, Richard, 1986, The Blind Watchmaker: Why The Evidence Of Evolution Reveals A Universe Without Design, New York, Norton.
- Futuyma, Douglas J, 2006, Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates.
- Gould, Stephen Jay, 2010, Hen’s Teeth And Horse’s Toes: Further Reflections In Natural History. W. W. Norton.
- Hasker, William, 1992, “Evolution And Alvin Plantinga”, Perspectives On Science And Christian Faith, N. 44 (3), p150–162.
- ———, 1993, “Should Natural Science Include Revealed Truth? A Response To Plantinga”, Perspectives On Science And Christian Faith, N. 45 (1), p 57–59.
- Kvanvig, Jonathan L. ed, 2011, Oxford Studies In Philosophy Of Religion, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- McMullin, Ernan, 1991, “Plantinga’s Defense Of Special Creation”, Christian Scholar’s Review, 21, p 55–70.
- ———, 1993, “Evolution And Special Creation”, Zygon, 28 (3), p 299–335.
- Plantinga, Alvin, 1996, “Methodological Naturalism.”, In Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics, edited by Robert Penoock, London, England, A Bradford Book.
- ———, 1991 a, “When Faith And Reason Clash: Evolution And The Bible.”, Christian Scholar’s Review, 21 (1), p 8–32.
- ———, 1991 b, “Evolution, Neutrality, And Antecedent Probability: A Reply To Van Till And McMullin.”, Christian Scholar’s Review, 21 (1), p 80–109.
- ———, 1992, “Augustinian Christian Philosophy.”, The Monist, 75 (3), p 291–320.
- ———, 1994, “On Christian Scholarship.”, In The Challenge And Promise Of A Catholic University, edited by Theodore Hesburgh, University of Notre Dame Press.
- ———, 1995 a. “Christian Scholarship: Need (Lecture Notes).”, from:
- http://www.calvin.edu/academic/philosophy/virtual_library/articles/plantinga_alvin/c hristian_scholarship_need.pdf.
- ———, 1995 b. “Christian Philosophy At The End Of The 20th Century.” In Christian Philosophy At The Close Of The Twentieth Century, edited by Sander Griffioen and Bert Balk.
- ———, 1996, “Science: Augustinian Or Duhemian.”, Faith And Philfosophy, 13 (3), p 368–394.
- ———, 1997, “Methodological Naturalism.”, Origins And Design, 18 (1), p 18–27.
- ———, 2001, “Creation And Evolution: A Modest Proposal.”, In Intelligent Design Creationism And Its Critics, edited by Robert Penoock. London, England, A Bradford Book.
- ———, 2011, Where The Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, And Naturalism, New York, Oxford University Press.
- Plantinga, Alvin and Michael Tooley, 2008, Knowledge Of God. Malden, MA; Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Cite this article:
RIS
Mendeley
BibTeX
APA
MLA
HARVARD
VANCOUVER
, Seyed Mustafa, Daneshwar, Yousof. (2017) The Relationship between Science and Religion in Plantinga 's Initial View. Ma`rifat-e Kalami, 8(1), 23-42
Seyed Mustafa ; Yousof Daneshwar."The Relationship between Science and Religion in Plantinga 's Initial View". Ma`rifat-e Kalami, 8, 1, 2017, 23-42
, S, Daneshwar, Y.(2017) 'The Relationship between Science and Religion in Plantinga 's Initial View', Ma`rifat-e Kalami, 8(1), pp. 23-42
