Ma`rifat Kalami

One of the inevitable ideas of Avicennism and one of the outcomes of the philosophical system of the Peripatetic school is the belief that the realization of "God’s knowledge of the other things (ma siva Allah)" is through the occurrence of the forms of the acquired knowledge on the Divine essence. This research aims to investigate Molla Sadra’s comments on Ibn Sina's view regarding the occurrence of scientific forms in the Divine essence for the realization of the “Divine knowledge of the other things”. Using two methods of description and analysis, this study presents a precise report of the Avicennism theory of the "Divine knowledge of the other beings", based on a systematic understanding of Avicenna's philosophy; then analyzes this theory, considering Sadra's points, and also studies the preferred theory of Molla Sadra. This research is done based on library data. According to the principles of Avicennism, it is not possible to come up with any idea in which we can talk about the union of two realities. According to his epistemological geometry, Avicenna has no choice but to accept the existential distinction between the Divine essence and the prior knowledge. Rejecting the criticisms of previous scholars on this theory, Molla Sadra puts forward different considerations, sometimes as basic criticisms and sometimes as structural criticisms. I can definitively say: the difference between Molla Sadra and Ibn Sina's views - Ibn Sina's belief in the occurrence and Molla Sadra’s belief in the identicality – is due to their different philosophical geometry.