Ma`rifat Kalami

The main problem of this research is to examine the positive arguments of theologians in proving "the restoration of the non-existent" in a descriptive-analytical method and its purpose is to show the ineffectiveness of this argument in proving the mentioned claim. The theologians who defend this point of view, call the re-creation of creatures against their first creation, which is called "first", as "restoration" and believe that the new creation - that is, the resurrection - is the same as the first creation, that is, the beginning. The essay of the authors of this study shows that the defenders of this view have put forward ten arguments in their theological works to prove their claims. In a general division, these arguments are divided into two parts, "standard" and "metaphorical", which have been criticized and examined in this research, regardless of the evidence of the abstention of restoration of the non-existent. Logical analysis through physical and formal examination of these arguments shows that none of them is complete in proving the claim.