Abstract:
Our question in this essay is how is the Christian faith possible intrinsically impossible affairs? Christianity is based on a firm belief in such things as the incarnation of God, His suffering, His death, and then His resurrection from the dead. And these dogmatic beliefs, which must be unequivocally accepted, are called "dogmas." But these are intrinsically impossible affairs. The research method of this paper is based on "formal logic" and citing various rules, which have hereby been analyzed to have the meaning of "intrinsically impossible affairs ". The most important finding of this paper is that intrinsic abstinences lack a product concept in the mind and should be considered "concept of the facade". After logically proving this, it becomes clear that belief in an inherently abstinent is, in fact, an unbelievable faith. Consequently, since one cannot believe in anything, it must inevitably be assumed that a Christian person imagines an image of a possible concept (an imaginary and vague concept), believes in it, and incorrectly refrains from it. He adapts existence (for example, the incarnation of God) to that mental concept and then claims that he has become a believer in the impossible.